# Difference between revisions of "Faq how RMSEC and RMSECV related to R2Y and Q2Y seen other software"

(→Possible Solutions:) |
|||

Line 27: | Line 27: | ||

R2Y and Q2Y generally increase towards 1 as a model's fit improves whereas RMSEC and RMSECV decrease to zero | R2Y and Q2Y generally increase towards 1 as a model's fit improves whereas RMSEC and RMSECV decrease to zero | ||

+ | |||

+ | Note that it is possible for R2Y or Q2Y to become negative if the predicted or CV predicted y-values are particularly bad. | ||

RMSEC/CV are in units of the original y-block and can be interpreted as "error levels" (They are very similar to standard deviations) whereas R2Y and Q2Y are in fractional units | RMSEC/CV are in units of the original y-block and can be interpreted as "error levels" (They are very similar to standard deviations) whereas R2Y and Q2Y are in fractional units | ||

Line 38: | Line 40: | ||

- an eigenvalue plot from the Analysis window | - an eigenvalue plot from the Analysis window | ||

− | |||

## Latest revision as of 13:40, 19 May 2020

### Issue:

How are RMSEC and RMSECV related to R2Y and Q2Y I see in other software?

### Possible Solutions:

In some software, the values "R2Y" and "Q2Y" are reported for regression models. The R2Y value is equivalent to the y-block cumulative variance captured (as reported in the 5th column of the variance captured table or the .detail.ssq field of a model).

The "Q2Y" value is analogous to R2Y except it is based on the cross-validated results. It is related to the RMSECV values according to this equation :

where RMSECV is the root mean square error of cross-validation, m is the number of samples and yi is the actual (aka measured) y-value for sample #i. These relations are only true if the y-block is mean-centered before the model is built.

R2Y and Q2Y represent fractions of variance captured while the cumulative variance captured table and `.detail.ssq`

field represent percentages. They are identical except for a factor of 100 difference between fraction and percentage.

Given a PLS model named "m" which used only mean centering or autoscaling on the univariate y-block, the following code calculates R2Y and Q2Y:

>> incl = m.detail.include{1,2}; >> y = m.detail.data{2}.data(incl,:); >> my = length(incl); >> R2Y = (1-(m.rmsec.^2)*my./sum(mncn(y).^2)) >> Q2Y = (1-(m.rmsecv.^2)*my./sum(mncn(y).^2))

The practical aspects of these statistics are:

R2Y and Q2Y generally increase towards 1 as a model's fit improves whereas RMSEC and RMSECV decrease to zero

Note that it is possible for R2Y or Q2Y to become negative if the predicted or CV predicted y-values are particularly bad.

RMSEC/CV are in units of the original y-block and can be interpreted as "error levels" (They are very similar to standard deviations) whereas R2Y and Q2Y are in fractional units

These values are available from:

- the Matlab command line

>> m.r2y >> m.q2y

- an eigenvalue plot from the Analysis window

**Still having problems? Please contact our helpdesk at helpdesk@eigenvector.com**